Slipknot Fights for Slipknot.com Domain Against Anonymous Bootlegger
Slipknot’s Lawsuit Over Domain Name
Slipknot has initiated legal action against the unknown owner of the Slipknot.com domain, aiming to reclaim the site that has been used to sell counterfeit merchandise connected to the band.
Longstanding Domain Dispute
For nearly 25 years, an unidentified entity has held onto the Slipknot.com URL, leaving the official representation of the band at Slipknot1.com. Since their launch, both websites have coexisted. However, the situation has escalated as Slipknot.com directs fans to products labeled as “Cheap Promo Products” and “Costume Masks”—all imitations of authentic merchandise that the band offers.
Legal Steps Taken
The lawsuit was filed in a Virginia federal court earlier this week, under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. Unfortunately, the true identity of the domain owner remains a mystery. This individual acquired the domain in February 2001, shortly after the release of Slipknot’s debut album, and is connected to the registration through a post office box in the Grand Caymans.
Band’s Legal Argument
Craig Reilly, the band’s lawyer, articulated in the lawsuit that the domain was registered with the intent of profiting from Slipknot’s reputation. He emphasized that unsuspecting fans, believing they are on an official site affiliated with the band, may inadvertently click on ads and sponsored links, ultimately leading to financial harm for Slipknot.
Current Situation
As of Saturday, Slipknot.com remains operational, still selling bootleg merchandise and offering services like “Image Generative AI.”
What are your thoughts on the implications of domain squatting for artists?
