Kerala High Court Questions Customs Over Dulquer Salmaan’s Land Rover Seizure
Kerala High Court Questions Customs Over Land Rover Seizure
The Kerala High Court is probing the Customs Department regarding its recent seizure of actor Dulquer Salmaan’s vintage Land Rover. This thorough inquiry raises questions about the evidence and reasons provided for the action taken.
Court Hearing Insights
Judge Ziyad Rahman A.A. presided over the case, pushing Customs officials for clarity. He inquired, "What documents do you have? What evidence supports your claim?" He also emphasized that if due processes weren’t followed in the seizure, the court had the right to intervene. The judge insisted that authorities must substantiate their actions legally.
The court criticized the lack of documentation, underscoring that simply citing a law does not justify deprivation of property. "There should be a clear mention of any illegality," the judge stated, highlighting the importance of accountability.
Background on the Seizure
On September 26, Dulquer approached the Kerala High Court following the confiscation of his luxury vehicle by Customs. The seizure occurred amidst a larger crackdown named Operation Numkhor, which has been targeting various luxury vehicles allegedly smuggled into India. During this operation, Customs also seized several other cars with questionable paperwork.
Dulquer’s 2004 Land Rover Defender, which he acquired last year, was among the vehicles taken. The actor argued that prolonged exposure of the vehicle could lead to irreversible damage, prompting his appeal for its release.
Operation Numkhor’s Reach
Operation Numkhor took its name from the Bhutanese word for “vehicle” and focused on various high-profile residences across Kerala. It aimed to locate and seize around 38 high-end luxury cars linked to potential smuggling activities.
Dulquer expressed concern over the condition of his vehicle if left unprotected for too long. He urged the court to allow the car’s return to prevent further deterioration.
In light of these developments, how do you feel about the protocols surrounding vehicle seizures? Do you think proper evidence should always be a prerequisite?
