Chris Brown Shares His Perspective on Housekeeper Dog Incident: ‘I’m Not Bad’

## Chris Brown’s Legal Battle Over Dog Attack Incident

As Chris Brown approaches a trial set for February regarding a civil lawsuit from a housekeeper, he has publicly detailed his side of an incident that occurred five years ago at his Los Angeles residence. This case involves allegations stemming from a severe dog attack.

### Background of the Incident

Maria Avila, the housekeeper, claims she was viciously attacked by a large dog, which left her with horrifying injuries while she was removing trash from the property on December 12, 2020. Her lawsuit describes how Brown allegedly ignored her pleas for help, adding severe emotional distress to her physical injuries.

Brown’s legal strategy includes asking the court to dismiss claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and punitive damages against him. His recent deposition statements present a starkly different version of events compared to Avila’s account.

### Chris Brown’s Testimony

In his deposition, Brown recounts that he was in his upstairs bedroom when he first heard the dog growling. He explained how the sound prompted him to check the situation outside, where he found Avila lying on the ground.

“I didn’t touch her. I bent down and looked to see if she was breathing,” Brown stated. He describes that he saw her chest moving but didn’t engage her in conversation as he believed she was unconscious.

### Discrepancies Between Accounts

Avila’s allegations include a dramatic portrayal of her suffering while, according to Brown, he heard no cries for help and witnessed no blood initially. He mentions that his management advised him to leave the scene once it became clear that emergency services were on their way.

The contrast continues with Avila’s sister, Patricia, who claims to have rushed outside to find her sister severely injured. This buildup of testimony intensifies the public’s focus on the case dynamics.

### Brown’s Response to Legal Claims

In court filings, Brown argues that Avila has not proven any malic intent behind his actions and insists that her emotional distress claims should be dismissed. His legal team asserts that subsequent actions, like relocating the dog, were not meant to conceal evidence, but rather to ensure safety and prevent future incidents.

They note that any discussion regarding the aftermath should not influence the legality of the initial incident.

### Future Trials and Continuing Developments

The consolidated trial for Avila’s lawsuit and her sister’s negligence claim is set for February 9, 2026. Meanwhile, the courtroom discussions will likely incorporate testimonies about post-incident actions, which Brown’s defense argues were mischaracterized as malicious.

Brown’s recent motion to dismiss these claims is on track for a hearing slated for January 15. The defense also highlighted a lack of security footage during the incident, attributing it to previously reported break-ins that compromised the cameras.

—

What are your thoughts on how this case might influence public perception of Chris Brown?